Zero Infinity Partners Closes $156M Fund II for Infratech

TL;DR
Zero Infinity Partners, a New York-based venture firm dedicated entirely to "infratech" — technology sitting at the intersection of infrastructure and innovation — has closed its second fund at $156 million, oversubscribed and roughly 50% larger than its approximately $104 million debut vehicle. The firm backs early-stage companies building for energy, power, mobility, logistics, water, waste, digital infrastructure and biomanufacturing, on the thesis that AI's physical buildout, reindustrialization, power scarcity and aging infrastructure are forcing a multi-trillion-dollar wave of capital into the physical world. It matters because Fund I already produced a marquee outcome in Metropolis, the AI-powered parking network now valued above $5 billion, giving Zero Infinity a real proof point in a category that a growing number of generalist funds are trying to muscle into.
Key Takeaways
A 50% step-up on an oversubscribed fund is a real signal in this market. Plenty of sector-focused funds are struggling to get anywhere near their prior fund size in 2026's tight LP environment. Zero Infinity not only raised more, it appears to have raised more than it initially targeted, which suggests institutional LPs are actively rotating capital into infrastructure-adjacent venture rather than just holding steady.
Metropolis is doing a lot of the fundraising work. A parking-and-computer-vision company crossing a $5 billion valuation out of a debut infratech fund is exactly the kind of outcome that turns a thesis into an asset class in LPs' eyes. It's rare for a first-time sector fund to get validation this large this early, and it changes the conversation from "is infratech investable" to "who is best positioned to keep finding these."
The team's balance-sheet-and-operator bench is the real differentiator. A roster that draws from Antin, Blackstone, Fortress, Glencore, Stonepeak and Morgan Stanley alongside venture names like Collaborative Fund and First Round Capital is a deliberate hybrid: infrastructure-finance underwriting discipline paired with early-stage venture instincts. That combination is genuinely harder to replicate than capital alone, and it's the argument Zero Infinity is making against both generalist AI funds and traditional infra PE shops drifting downstream.
Infratech is getting crowded, and that's the risk to watch. Every large multi-stage fund now claims an "AI needs physical infrastructure" thesis, from hyperscaler-adjacent power deals to robotics logistics. Zero Infinity's edge is depth and specialization at the early stage, but as more growth and PE capital chases the same reindustrialization narrative, the firm's ability to stay disciplined on seed and Series A entry points, rather than drifting into larger, later, more competitive checks, will determine whether Fund II's returns look like Fund I's.
Fund Overview
Fund Name: Zero Infinity Partners Fund II
Fund Size: $156 million (oversubscribed; Fund I was approximately $104 million)
Stage: Early-stage (seed through Series A)
Check Size: Not publicly disclosed
Geography: U.S.-headquartered (New York), infrastructure themes with global relevance
Focus: "Infratech" — technologies for physical infrastructure across energy, power, mobility, logistics, digital infrastructure, water, waste and biomanufacturing
Key LPs: Not disclosed in the firm's announcement
Why This Fund Matters
Venture capital spent the better part of the last decade underweighting anything that touched physical infrastructure, treating capital-intensive, regulation-heavy, slow-to-scale sectors as better suited to project finance and private equity than to a 10-year VC fund. Zero Infinity's entire premise is that this was a mistake, and 2026's macro backdrop is proving the firm right faster than most infratech skeptics expected. AI data centers are running into power constraints that are reshaping utility planning cycles. Reindustrialization policy in the U.S. and Europe is pulling manufacturing capacity back onshore. Aging grids, ports, water systems and logistics networks all need a software-and-hardware upgrade cycle that didn't exist as an investable category five years ago.
What makes Zero Infinity's step-up notable isn't just the dollar figure, it's the speed. A firm going from a roughly $104 million debut fund to a $156 million, oversubscribed sophomore vehicle in a market where plenty of established generalist funds are flat or down on fundraising is a genuine outlier. That kind of demand usually means one of two things: either LPs are chasing a narrative, or the firm has already shown enough distributed or marked-up value to justify conviction. Metropolis crossing a $5 billion valuation, alongside EnCharge AI's analog AI accelerator bet and Azalea Robotics in airport logistics, gives Zero Infinity the second explanation, which is the harder one to manufacture.
The firm's three stated priorities — digitization and automation, decarbonization and electrification, and differentiated project development — read like a fairly conventional infrastructure-tech taxonomy on paper. What differentiates the execution is the team underneath it, built specifically to underwrite both the venture risk (can this technology work, can this team execute) and the infrastructure risk (can this actually get sited, permitted, financed and built at scale). That dual competency is the actual moat, not the taxonomy.
The competitive question worth watching is how crowded this thesis gets over the next 18 months. Every large multi-stage fund now has some version of an "AI needs power and physical infrastructure" pitch, and traditional infrastructure private equity firms are increasingly willing to write smaller, earlier checks to get exposure to the same reindustrialization story. Zero Infinity's advantage is that it was underwriting this thesis before it was consensus, but consensus theses compress returns over time as more capital chases the same entry points.
The Team
Zero Infinity Partners is led by founder and managing partner John Kwaak. The investment team includes managing directors Anagh Tiwary and Alex Demeulenaere, and investment associate Lucy Smith. Chris Mann serves as operating partner and chair of the firm's senior advisory board, with Ashika Kalra as platform director. The firm also runs a venture partner bench of Ben Frank, John Lee and Kunal Sinha, distinct from the core investment team.
The senior advisory board leans heavily on infrastructure-operator credibility rather than pure finance pedigree: Rob Knight, the former CFO of Union Pacific, and Michael Whitaker, the former Administrator of the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, sit alongside Badar Khan and Bill Yun. Combined with an investment team whose backgrounds span Antin, Blackstone, Fortress, Glencore, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Stonepeak on the infrastructure-finance side, and Collaborative Fund and First Round Capital on the venture side, the bench is built to underwrite both halves of an infratech bet at once.
Early Portfolio
Fund I's disclosed positions include Metropolis, the AI-powered parking and computer-vision network now valued above $5 billion; EnCharge AI, which builds analog AI accelerator chips; and Azalea Robotics, which automates airport baggage handling. Fund II has already begun deploying into Fluidstack, Somos, Bright AI and General Aviation, spanning AI infrastructure, metals midstream and aviation infrastructure themes.
What This Means for Founders
If you're building a company where the hard part isn't just the software but also the physical deployment — a power interconnect, a permitting process, a manufacturing line, a fleet rollout — Zero Infinity is one of the few checks that will underwrite that complexity rather than treat it as a red flag. The firm's advisory bench in particular is worth pitching for reasons beyond capital: a former Class I railroad CFO and a former FAA Administrator can open doors that a typical seed partner cannot.
The tradeoff is that this is not a fund for a pure software story with no physical-world dependency. Founders should expect diligence that goes deeper into siting, regulatory pathway and capital-intensity questions than a standard early-stage term sheet process, and should come prepared to talk about how the business scales past the first few physical deployments, not just the first sale.
Fund Momentum Take
Zero Infinity's Fund II is a good data point for anyone still skeptical that infratech is a durable venture category rather than a 2025-2026 zeitgeist trade. A 50% step-up, oversubscribed, on the back of one large realized-on-paper outcome is exactly the trajectory a specialist fund needs to build a franchise, and the operator-heavy advisory bench is a genuinely differentiated structural choice rather than a marketing flourish.
Our bet is that the firms that win in infratech over the next fund cycle will be the ones that stay disciplined about staying early and staying specialized, resisting the pull to write bigger, later, more competitive checks as growth and PE capital piles into the same reindustrialization thesis. Zero Infinity's Fund I discipline (roughly $104 million, tightly deployed into a small number of category-defining bets) is the model to watch for; the real test is whether a 50% larger fund can maintain that same selectivity rather than spreading capital across more, later-stage, higher-multiple deals just because the check size allows it.
The risk isn't the thesis, it's crowding. As more capital recognizes that AI's buildout runs through physical infrastructure, the entry multiples on the best infratech deals will compress. Zero Infinity's edge is a two-year-plus head start and a team built specifically for this underwriting problem; whether that's durable against a wall of new capital is the open question for Fund III.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is "infratech" investing?
Infratech refers to venture investing in technologies built for physical infrastructure sectors — energy, power, transportation, logistics, water, waste and digital infrastructure — rather than pure software or consumer internet businesses. It combines venture-style technology risk with infrastructure-style deployment, permitting and capital-intensity risk.
How big is Zero Infinity Partners' Fund II?
Fund II closed at $156 million, oversubscribed, up roughly 50% from the firm's approximately $104 million debut fund.
What stage does Zero Infinity Partners invest at?
The firm invests at the early stage, from seed through Series A, in companies building infratech across energy, mobility, logistics, water, waste, digital infrastructure and biomanufacturing.
What is Zero Infinity Partners' most notable portfolio company?
Metropolis, an AI-powered parking and computer-vision network from Fund I, is now valued above $5 billion, making it the firm's marquee outcome to date.
Who leads Zero Infinity Partners?
John Kwaak is founder and managing partner. The investment team includes managing directors Anagh Tiwary and Alex Demeulenaere, supported by a senior advisory board that includes former Union Pacific CFO Rob Knight and former FAA Administrator Michael Whitaker.
Have a fund closing to announce? Submit your fund here.
Need help raising capital? Check out our Fundraising Advisory services.
Related funds in the index
Seed · Deep Tech funds from the verified index
| Fund | Size | Stage | Location | Focus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inflexor Ventures Fund III | $48M USD | Seed | India | Deep Tech, Semiconductors +3 |
| Khosla Ventures 2026 Fund Family | Up to $5.5B (targeted, reported) USD | Seed | United States | AI/ML, Deep Tech +3 |
| Dimension III | $800M USD | Seed | United States | Biotech, AI/ML +1 |
| Greylock 18 | $1.5B USD | Seed | United States | AI/ML, Cybersecurity +3 |
| Climentum Capital Fund II | €100M EUR | Seed | Denmark | Climate & Sustainability, EnergyTech +1 |